Saturday, December 10, 2016

Week 13: Information Literacy Guide

Information Literacy Guide:
    Audience – High School students

Introduction:
As a literacy teacher at the high school level, I have created this guide to address an important element of information literacy that is relevant and essential in our “participatory” landscape of media creation and consumption. This guide primarily addresses the critical thinking skills necessary to intelligently navigate the world of social media communication. In an era where “fake news” proliferates, especially through social media forums, it’s incredibly important to develop critical thinking skills. The skills targeted below, however, also connect to the broader literacy skills that are essential for communication and research in college and the workplace.

Critical thinking skills: critical reading and writing in the age of social media

·      Critical questioning
o   Questioning is at the heart of evaluating the validity of information that appears on social media timelines, in headlines on internet websites, and in memes that get passed around through social media. Important questions include (but are not limited to) the following:
§  Does the information seem credible in general? Why or why not?
§  Who wrote the information? (If an author is not credited, what might this mean for the credibility of the information?)
§  Where was the information initially posted? Does this source have a any clear bias?
§  Does the claim make broad, unsubstantiated generalizations? If so, what part of the claim might hold some truth?
§  For memes and graphics, what kind of editing or photo-shopping is evident? What might this mean?
§  Am I inclined to believe the information solely because of my own biases? Why or why not? What might this mean for me?

·      Critical research: Searching for reliable evidence
o   Once we question information that we see, it’s important to search for additional information that could shed light on the reliability of the source, and the accuracy of the claims. Next steps can include (but are not limited to) the following:
§  Google key words of the claim or topic and take note of the websites that come up with related content.
§  Cross-reference the information found on other websites/sources. What seems to be missing? What appears the same? What new information do you find?
§  Take note of the kinds of sites that contain similar information. What can I find out about the source where the information is published? Are they well known? Reliable? Are any of these sources a news sites that requires fact checking of published information, and how do I know?

·      Analyzing contradictions and nuances in information
o   It’s very important to evaluate findings across numerous sources of information. Almost always, this exercise will lead to contradiction, however. These contradictions can result of differing interpretations of the same information, possibly due to bias. Analyze and question these contradictions, and find the nuanced differences between various sources. Often, the “truth” is somewhere in the middle.






Reference:
Garcia, E., Martin, C. M., McPhee, M. (2012) Information Literacy Outreach:
Building a high school program at California State University Northridge. Education Libraries, Volume 35 Numbers 1-2. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ989512.pdf





Sunday, November 27, 2016

Week 11: Reflections on Adolescent Interview

For this assignment, I interviewed a small group of my 11th grade students. They were incredibly eager to add their comments, perspectives, and experiences to the conversation; in fact half way through the interview two more students joined in because they were so interested in our discussion. The two most vocal participants in the interview were both English Language Learners, so their use of digital devices connected very specifically to both their language learning experiences as well as to their experiences bridging multiple cultures. Seeing the use of technology and digital devices through this particular lens was interesting; the students depend on their phones for all kinds of functions and tasks daily.

I found this process really interesting, and the students loved that they got to share their expertise, experience, and values on this topic. Throughout the interview, there were two major take-away-results for me. The first was the response to the question about how technology could better be used in school. I was shocked that the students turned immediately to ways that access to their devices – particularly access to social media sites – could be limited during the school day. Without any prompting from me, they talked candidly about the ways that they struggle to self-regulate in this area. This got me thinking about ways that we can better teach students to learn and develop this competency. Even as adults, we often struggle with some kind of “addiction” to our devices, but how are we teaching young people about etiquette, self-control, time management, etc.? It is clear to me that many young people want permission to access their phones throughout the day, but they want boundaries that will help them to focus. I think there is a lot of research and experimentation that could be done here.

The second take-away was the response to the idea of technology/social media and its impact on empathy skills. Throughout our conversation, students did seem to find more and more agreement with the idea that social media is affecting the way we interact with and relate to others. But students were quick to point out that they do seek each other out for in-person communication, and they see its significance in relationship building. I would like to explore this topic further, and see if we can find ways to help students become more critical of their practices without moralizing their access to and use of technology and social media.




Interview Questions and Results:


Estimate how many hours you spend on your phone daily:

6-7 hours per day – in a sense, almost constantly. In school, we need our phones for translation, and we use them outside of school for communication and social media use.

List all the activities that cause you to use your phone:

Translator, social media, research, calculator functions, photo gallery, music, games, and texting.

In your opinion, what are the pros and cons of cell phone usage by teens?

The pros of phone usage among teens, especially ELL’s is clearly the access to translation and research functions. Being able to share photos and memories also struck the students as important and positive.

The cons of phone usage – the students all agreed – related to social media drama/bullying and the general distractions of phones that lead to wasted time.

In your opinion, what are the pros and cons of social media usage by teens?

The pros of social media definitely center on staying connected. Staying in touch with friends across the world, as well as being able to promote accomplishments and events (dance performances, original art, for example) added to benefits of social media platforms. One student cited the ALS challenge that spread virally through social media (Instagram and Facebook in particular) – raising awareness around the issue, and motivating young people to get involved and contribute. Students also talked about being able to follow artists or brands that they liked through hash tags.

The cons, predictably, came down to cyber bullying. Students spoke very clearly and maturely about the ways they see teens making fun of others on social media, exposing information about others, and engaging in behaviors that are generally inappropriate, especially for minors. One young lady spoke passionately about how she tried to defend another young person who was being attacked on social media, and she got dragged through the dirt while trying to take the “high road.”

Do you use your device mostly for friendship-driven activities (texting/communicating with friends) or interest-driven activities (like gaming)? Explain:

The students I interviewed named friendship-driven activities as the main use for phones and digital devices. Of course texting and communicating with friends on social media platforms dominated their described activities.

What social media sites do you use most often? Explain your choice/preference.

On this question, the students schooled me mostly about SnapChat. This is one social media platform that I don’t use, and therefore don’t understand well. They animatedly discussed the “game” features on this platform, and ways to earn points while enjoying the camera filters and sharing funny anecdotes with friends. They explained snapcode to me, but I still don’t feel like I understand it by the description alone. Facebook and Instagram were other popular social media sites they like. One girl said that Instagram allows her to see what her ex-boyfriends are up to. Others agreed with this, explaining that Instagram facilitates ways to see what your friends/significant others are up to through photographic evidence, whereas Facebook is a more comfortable mode for sharing written content, expressing moods and feelings, etc.  My two ELL’s from Ukraine also told me about a Russian site called VK – which is illegal in the US – but allows them to stream movies, music, etc.

Do you use the same social media platforms as your friends? Why/Why not?

No surprises here – friends tend to emulate each others’ habits and preferences with social media usage.

How did you learn to use or navigate your favorite apps and / or social media platforms?

Just as Don Tapscott describes in his presentation, these students talk about “learning” digital media platforms and apps as though they are truly gifted. This question baffled them, because they feel that these skills are more or less self evident…

Which kinds of technology and / or new media do you find most useful in school? Explain:

My ELL’s in particular rely upon Google Translator, PupilPath (to track grades, attendance, etc. for our school), Google Docs, Scanable, and Studyblue. They are very academically minded, and enjoy being able to use their phones to support learning and understanding in various subject areas.

How do you think teachers can use technology better in the classroom?

This answer REALLY surprised me. The students actually made suggestions for ways to block social media apps in school. Rather than give me information about using technology in innovative ways (aside from getting tablets for all students to use in class for note taking, reading, writing, etc.) they wanted to discuss ways to keep their phones from distracting them. Somehow they knew this would not be possible without a force outside of themselves keeping them honest…

How does your use of technology or digital media differ from your parents/ teachers/ people older than you?

Again, students’ answers mirrored the confidence that Tapscott unpacks. They felt that “growing up digital” has more or less made them quick studies for new technologies, apps, and digital tools. They feel that figuring out how to navigate new media is possible with very little thought or effort. Parents or older folks, these students felt, were always asking for help to fix or set up apps, devices, etc. Students reported that even after showing parents how to do certain functions, they needed the information over and over. My anecdotal evidence certainly supports Tapscott’s theory that our young people have a certain expertise in this area – one that they have over older generations.

How do you think social media / access to phones affects teens’ ability to empathize with others?


This question turned into a truly fascinating conversation. At first, students seemed reticent to make this connection, at least not so generally. However, once we got into the specifics of social media communication, particularly this idea of “hiding behind screens” when saying or sharing hurtful, aggressive comments or attacks, students were quick to say that social media complicates youth’s ability to engage compassionately and empathetically with each other. While they did say that they themselves didn’t feel that social media use hampered their ability to empathize, they did agree that communication and self-promotion through social media has many negative impacts on relationships and respectful communication.

Sunday, November 13, 2016

Deconstructing a Print Advertisement


Reflection:

I found this activity interesting and thought provoking. I often look at the ads around me on the subway to and from work, and I wonder about the intended audience; I wonder how effective they are; I wonder how much we take in without even thinking; I wonder how much we question the subtle message, or just subconsciously accept them as “truth.” When I had the chance to choose an ad for this project, I looked through lots of print ads on the Internet. I wanted to find an ad that had human subjects, and I especially wanted to look at ads that had to do with women.

What I came across was a Nike “women empowerment” ad campaign, featuring athletic women - or, more specifically, parts of female bodies - accompanied by words talking about what they love about various aspects of their bodies. I was immediately struck by the disembodied portrayal. Rather than show a whole women - with apparent complexities - the ads zoom in to feature very specific body parts: buttocks, legs, thighs, etc.  Furthermore, the language does not sound authentic to me; I am pretty certain that the copywriters for this campaign were men trying to imagine what women would say to portray a body-positive attitude. The overall feeling is still one of women being objectified and seen as one-dimensional.  

What made this activity most useful and interesting was the set of guided questions included in the ad deconstruction protocols. Although I had lots of immediate opinions and reactions when looking at the ads, it was helpful to go carefully through the steps of the analysis protocol, forcing me to to think more deeply about layers of the messaging and the larger implications of the messaging.

Although I consider myself thoughtful and analytical about advisements and marketing campaigns, it’s practically impossible to stay hyper-alert at all times, keeping a critical eye open and observant. This activity was informative and deepened my understanding of advertisements’ purposes, messages, and implications further.

Use in the high school English classroom:
As I went through the process, I kept thinking: this would be the prefect activity for my high school students to engage as they deepen their analysis and critical thinking skills. I’ll be teaching a unit on rhetoric in the spring, and so I think it will be a great component to add to that unit. I think that the analysis protocols can be helpful step-by-step guide for students as they learn how to think about advertisement messages.




Friday, November 4, 2016

Week 8 Journal: Critical Literacy and Media Education

Critical literacy has everything to do with questioning what is consumed. Or rather, questioning before merely consuming. According to Shor (2009), “critical literacy is language use that questions the social construction of the self.” (p. 282). Critical literacy is especially relevant when considering exposure to and consumption of media content. However, being able to construct and pose questions about the information we encounter does not happen on its own; explicit instruction on skills related to critical questioning of information, content, and media is essential.

The information about advertising (“Exposure and Industry Statistics”) provides salient information to this point, particularly in citing the example of Sweden’s regulations surrounding advertising on children’s programs. The handout states that “Sweden, since 1991, has banned all advertising during children’s prime time due to findings that children under 10 are incapable of telling the difference between a commercial and a program, and cannot understand the purpose of a commercial until the age of 12.” To me, this is incredibly impressive. Developmentally, children and young people do not have all of the cognitive skills to differentiate between simple information and propaganda; even the teens I teach struggle with interpreting nuances in narratives and informational texts, and can’t always discern the ways that content is intended to persuade or influence their thinking. The Center for Media Literacy (2005) provides really helpful resources for classroom instruction on this topic.

Marshall McLuhan (1970) addresses this very issue when he observes that “Many educators think that the problem in education is just to get the information through, get it past the barrier, the opposition of the young, just to move it and keep it going.” But learning and, more importantly, learning to think critically, requires so much more. McLuhan adds that the “concern is what these media do to the people who use them. What did writing do to the people who invented it and used it? What do the other media of our time do to the people who use them?”

I recently attended a workshop that focused on questioning and discussion techniques and protocols. I am excited to employ some of the ideas I learned, especially regarding ways to teach students to more regularly and deeply question the information they receive and encounter.

References:

McLuhan, M. (1970). Living in an acoustic world. Retrieved 4 November 2016, from http://www.marshallmcluhanspeaks.com/lecture/1970-living-in-an-acoustic-world/.


Shor, I. (2009). What is critical literacy? In Darder, Baltodano, and Torres, Eds. The critical pedagogy reader. (p. 282-304) New York, NY: Routledge.